In the past five years, USB-C has become thego-to connector for a wide range of machines. Its spend on most android telephones , notebooks, tablets, recreation consoles, headphones, and even supplementaries like mouse, keyboards, and externalstorage drives. But when it comes to Apples most popularproduct, the iPhone, USB-C has yet to be adopted. Instead, every model of iPhone still usesa Lightning connector that was introduced eight years ago with the iPhone 5. This has already led parties to wonder why Apple hasnttransitioned the iPhone to USB-C, especially for a company who has a reputation of beingthe first to adopt new standards. So in this video, Im going to explain whyApple hasnt transitioned the iPhone to USB-C, and what that mean for their useds. This is Greg with Apple Explained, and youguys voted this topic into second place in the last poll. If youd like to help decide what topicsI cover in the future, dont forget to subscribe and tallies like this one will begin appearingin your mobile activity feed. Alright now why would Apple, the company whoadopted USB-A before anyone else with the original iMac, take so long to wreak USB-Cto their smartphones? Its pretty comical, especially consideringtheyve already included it in their iPad and Mac lineup.Well, the answer lies in a fib that beginsin 2010, when Apple was developing the iPhone 5. The device would be twelve percent smallerby volume compared to the previous 4S. Which conveyed the large 30 -pin connector neededto be replaced by something smaller in order to free up space for other components. At the time, Apple was helping to developthe USB-C standard with other corporations like Intel, Microsoft, and Samsung. But the new connector wouldnt be readyuntil 2014. Two times after the iPhone 5s release. So because of the bad timing, Apple was forcedinto a corner. They could either keep the 30 -pin connectorfor another two generations and sacrifice the iPhone 5 and 5s compact intends. Or they could create their own proprietaryconnector and compel fragmentation within not only the smartphone industry, but their ownproduct ecosystem. It was a lose-lose proposition, but Applewent with the latter option. That decision not only cause a huge amountof backlash from users in 2012, “whos” disheartened that Apple made all of their previous iPhoneaccessories obsolete, but its still causing them issues to this very day.For example, when USB-C was ready to go in2 014, Apple wasnt in a position to transition the iPhone lineup a second time, time twoyears later. They knew they had to stick with lightningfor as long as possible, or else they would be in for a PR nightmare. So they persisted, and when the AirPods wereintroduced in 2016, Apple was forced to use the same connector as the iPhone, since thetwo products were designed to be used together seamlessly. So Lightning was introduced to yet anotherproduct line. One that would expand into the AirPods Proand AirPods Max, which also had to use Lightning to maintain consistency between sits. Its almost like there was a smaller iPhoneecosystem that existed within the larger Apple ecosystem. Because while the iPhone and its accessoriescontinued to use Lightning, almost every other Apple product accepted USB-C. The MacBook linebegan transition periods in 2015, the iPad line in 2018, and the Mac Pro in 2019. You too have to consider the other controversialchanges Apple became with the iPhone in previous years.They removed the headphone jack in 2016, andthey removed the wall adapter from the iPhones packaging in 2020. Both of these decisions generated perhaps evenmore backlash than the transition to Lightning in 2012, and motived Apple to think twice beforemoving to USB-C, which would only add fuel to the fire. So how can we expect Apple to resolve thisconnector fragmentation issue in the future? Well, rumors are suggesting that it wontbe resolved, since Apple isnt planning on transitioning the iPhone to USB-C at all. Instead, theyre exploring the possibilityof removing the connector from particular iPhone sits solely. And there are benefits to this approach. A smartphone with no port would be more waterresistant because it framework could be completely sealed off. And it would be more sturdy. Since inserting and removing a connector thousandsof goes can cause wear, proliferation of debris, and contact controversies. But how would the phone be charged withouta port? Well, Apple has already implemented a solutionwith the iPhone 12 lineup.The examples “ve got something” announced Magsafe, which is essentially a Qi wireless charger surrounded by a hoop of magnets. This impels the accuse event very similarto an Apple Watch, a machine that also happens to be port-less. And if Apple wants to include wireless datapass through, there is an opportunity simply borrow the Smart Connector from the iPad. Everything Apple needs to create a port-lessiPhone already exists, and it simply seems to be a matter of time before they compile the transitionaway from wired connectors alone. At that stage, I consider each category of Appledevice will of their own unique methods of charging. Their computers and iPads, which Apple hasbeen calling computer replacements regardles, will feature USB-C. Their mobile manoeuvres likethe iPhone and Apple Watch will peculiarity accessible grab-and-go magnetic wireless billing. While accessories like the AirPods, MagicMouse, and Magic Keyboard, will continue to use Lightning.With wireless charge available when possibleas a gadget facet. This approach spawns the most sense to me, but well have to wait and visualize what decisions Apple realise with the release of brand-new productsin the near future. Alright chaps thank you for having watching until theend, dont forget to subscribe to help decide which topics I include, and Ill see you inthe next video ..
